Search for: "Vars v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2012, 5:10 am
Part V of the Child Care Act, 1991 states that in any proceedings before the Court the welfare of the child ‘must be the first and paramount consideration’ and that the Court ‘in so far as is practicable, give due consideration, having regard to his age and understanding, to the wishes of the child. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm
In the Oracle v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:47 pm
In a Westchester case, Malibu Media v Does 1-11, Doe 1 has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and to quash the subpoena served on the ISP. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
A State does not discharge its duty under international human rights law simply by having a social welfare system. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
Lemay and Imran ChaudhriA few days after the Apple v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
The acceptance-of-benefits doctrine states that a party cannot treat a judgment as both right and wrong. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
See e.g., Rivera v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
See e.g., Rivera v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 8:49 pm
July 8, 2011)(tortious interference state claim premised on DMCA takedown notices preempted by Federal DMCA provision); see also Miller v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 12:21 pm
Court of Appeals decision in Brunner v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:23 am
The cases are captioned “[Porn Company] v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
But the target date for the actual decision is always four months after the decision (in this case, that's already January), and even if the final decision was an import ban, there would be a 60-day Presidential Review period before it takes effect.In Germany, there are four Samsung v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
Motorola and Judge Alsup in Oracle v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
V. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
V. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
And Motorola's argument that an ex ante (before standardization) perspective on FRAND rates is not acceptable runs counter to Judge Posner's position on FRAND royalties in Apple v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am
Yesterday, the parties jointly asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for 60 additional days to file their initial pleadings. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am
Yesterday, the parties jointly asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for 60 additional days to file their initial pleadings. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:38 am
This month there will be two Mannheim trials over Samsung v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:49 am
As I said on previous occasions, there will be four Samsung v. [read post]
