Search for: "Velasquez v. Velasquez"
Results 41 - 60
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2006, 8:31 am
Velasquez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:45 pm
Velasquez, No. 07-0131 Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
” Velasquez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Velasquez-Otero v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
” Velasquez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
See In re Estate of Dawson, 136 N.J. 1, 20-21 (1994); Velasquez v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
See Velasquez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
See Maxwell, 588 F.3d at 251; Velasquez v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:18 pm
Costa está peor que Vásquez, comentar sus incoherencias significaría que me debo poner al nivel de ese imbécil. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:15 am
Sheppard v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Freedom Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:57 am
Velasquez), without any written opposition, and was then granted on defendant’s default by order dated March 1, 2022. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:07 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
See Velasquez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:05 pm
Enter the 3rd DCA and Judge Wells who said that the proper standard for such a motion for immunity was enunciated in Velasquez v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
" State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
Here, in Terio v Spodek ; 2009 NY Slip Op 04412 Decided on June 2, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see how that might happen: "To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909; Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380; Volpe v Canfield,… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
LEXIS 4411June 2, 2009, Decided we see a short answer: "To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff [**4] must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567, 840 N.Y.S.2d 410; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909, 822 N.Y.S.2d 564; Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380, 733 N.Y.S.2d 471; Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282, 283, 654 N.Y.S.2d 160). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
At one pole is Rust v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]