Search for: "Virginia Supreme Court" Results 41 - 60 of 12,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Dan Farber
What are the most important Supreme Court decisions in environmental law? [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From the 1960s onward, the Supreme Court has even given First Amendment protection to things like a swastika-brandishing neo-Nazi march through a Jewish community, a cross burning on a Black family's lawn, and Ku Klux Klan demonstrations. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:06 am by Legal Profession Prof
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals denied a petition for an emergency suspension of an already-suspended attorney We do not intend our denial of the current petition to be deemed critical of ODC’s action in filing a petition for... [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
They rely on the equal sovereignty principle, which the Supreme Court applied in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:14 am by Dan Filler
In 1875, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Minor's assertion, ruling that voting was not a right of national citizenship. [read post]
9 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Abraham (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Free Speech, Breathing Space, and Liability Insurance on SSRN. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:14 pm by Christine Corcos
In 1875, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Minor's assertion, ruling that voting was not a right of national citizenship. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:14 pm
In 1875, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Minor's assertion, ruling that voting was not a right of national citizenship. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:31 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article The Early Supreme Court Justices’ Most Significant Opinion was cited in the following article: Joshua J. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
During his over three decades on the Supreme Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., developed a jurisprudence that echoed across the 20th century. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 6, 1776 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
4 May 2024, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
READ MORE   Avoiding the Tyranny of Federal ‘Guidance’ The Supreme Court seems likely to curtail federal agencies’ interpretations of laws passed by Congress, but Washington bureaucrats have another way to exercise unaccountable power over state and local governments. [read post]