Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 41 - 60 of 6,658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
For example, polling indicates voters are more in favor of advancing climate legislation than their state legislatures or representatives are of bringing it. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:13 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
Here’s what’s happening.Working Families Coalition v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:22 pm by Howard Bashman
Wade was overturned, G.O.P. efforts to ban abortion have backfired with voters in many states — and they could do so again in November. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Though often hailed as an originalist triumph, Dobbs v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
From Brexit to The Hague (2016-2024) When the former Prime Minister and current Foreign Secretary David Cameron set the date for the EU referendum on 23 June 2016, this was widely regarded as just a political move to ensure support for the outcome of his renegotiations of the terms of continued membership in the European Union.[4] However, as the referendum results showed 51.9% of voters were actually in favour of leaving,[5] it became apparent that Downing Street had significantly… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:17 am by LawProfBlawg
The Voters.' The post SCOTUS v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:32 am by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Joshua A, Douglas‘ new book, “The Court v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
It said that it should be restated as an offence of intimidation, deception, and improper pressure on voters. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]