Search for: "WARD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
District of Columbia, currently before the D.C. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm
District of Columbia. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:26 am
In 2007, in United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Canada The trial in the case of Robinson v Furlong began on 15 June 2015 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Remember the three-judge district court we mentioned above? [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
” Lockhart’s petition asks “whether § 2252(b)(2)’s mandatory minimum sentence is triggered by a prior conviction … that did not ‘involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
“General personal representative” excludes special administrator. (36) “Petition” means a written request to the court for an order after notice.(37) “Proceeding” includes action at law and suit in equity.(38) “Property” includes both real and personal property or any interest therein and means anything that may be the subject of ownership.(39) “Protected person” is as defined in Section 5-102.(40) “Protective proceeding” means… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm
After nearly ninety minutes of oral arguments today in King v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:02 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:20 pm
” Petitioner Ward 5 Improvement Association (Ward 5) appealed the issuance of those certificates to the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA). [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
As of now, nineteen states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex couples to marry, and a rapid-fire set of recent federal court rulings suggests that there is no end in sight. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, finding that such boycotts were significantly expressive such that an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests presented in the particular case was necessary. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
While at one point, same-sex marriage was legal in only a single state (Massachusetts) and expressly prohibited in forty-four, it is now expressly permitted in thirteen (including California, by virtue of the dismissal of the appeal on Prop 8 in Perry) and in the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
” Ward v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:47 am
Thomas to provide substantial restitution to the District of Columbia treasury to recover funds unlawfully diverted. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:31 am
V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14] The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15] By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
