Search for: "WASHINGTON v SLACK"
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
Few if any prosecutions are initiated for marijuana possession—even, recently, in Colorado and Washington, where state law does not pick up the slack. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
The National Law Journal
The Supreme Court's unusual order Monday delaying a decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
Under a Supreme Court decision called Printz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
Headquarters: Washington, D.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine It is well understood by now that cyber security is a concern for every organization and that it is an issue on which every company’s board should be focused. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
CDT in headquartered in Washington, DC. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
CDT in headquartered in Washington, DC. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]