Search for: "WATERS v. THE STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 10,794
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am
A contrary ruling would have gutted the statute, leaving water quality largely subject to state permit authorities. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:09 pm
United States (Bankruptcy Discharge; McGirt v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
”Du Pont was sued in West Virginia state court by “individuals who had consumed the contaminated water” in the early 2000s. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
United States, in which the state sought compensation for the temporary flooding on a game management area due to a dam. [read post]
4 May 2024, 9:03 am
Water Mgmt. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:36 pm
Valeo was "a derelict on the waters of the law" even before the recent appointments to the Supreme Court, and in Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
