Search for: "WELLS v. WYETH" Results 41 - 60 of 571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 8:58 am by Brian Cordery
Wyeth counterclaimed for infringement, but for public health reasons did not seek injunctive relief. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
It will be in chronological order after Levine, and we'll mention the drug, the basic result, pro or con, as well as the nature of the claims involved, to the extent they differ from Levine.Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Rejected by the overwhelming majority of courts nationwide, as well as by the Third Restatement of Torts;2. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:29 pm
The Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog today had a post on the chances of the Democrats getting to 60 senators, discussing the implications on Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm by Bexis
It's no secret that non-medical device preemption arguments haven't been as successful after Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:37 pm
., that informed me  about two items concerning Diana Levine -- named plaintiff in the relatively well-known Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:18 pm
The professional musician had to have one of her arms amputated after she was improperly injected with the antinausea drug and developed gangrene.Levine sued the clinic where she received the injection, as well as the technician who administered the drug to her via IV-push. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2002), or the Second Circuit in Desiano v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:11 pm
One silver lining from the severe pruning that prescription drug preemption took in Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
The principle (derivedfrom the Supremacy Clause) that a federal law can supersede or supplant anyinconsistent state law or regulation.In a very recent 6-3 decision, turning on federal preemption of state law, theSupreme Court held in Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
The principle (derivedfrom the Supremacy Clause) that a federal law can supersede or supplant anyinconsistent state law or regulation.In a very recent 6-3 decision, turning on federal preemption of state law, theSupreme Court held in Wyeth v. [read post]