Search for: "WEST v. SPENCER" Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
, with his gift to landlords all, the case of Spencer v Taylor ably covered by Tessa earlier this week so I wont labour the point here. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm by Spencer Aronfeld
District Court, Southern District of West Virginia. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the Affordable Care… [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]