Search for: "WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDENT" Results 41 - 60 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In a series of blogposts and evidence to the House of Lords Communications Committee William Perrin and Professor Lorna Woods suggest that the answer should be yes. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am by Graham Smith
In a series of blogposts and evidenceto the House of Lords Communications Committee William Perrin and Professor Lorna Woods suggest that the answer should be yes. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee became the Superintendent of the water department of the City of Williams, Arizona in 1991. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm by Olivier Moréteau
Monday, May 308:45—9:15          Registration & Coffee 9:15—9:30           PLENARY—OPENING & WELCOMING ADDRESS·         William R. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:58 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
She has said that she remembers when she was eight years old, her father came home from his job as a schoolteacher and told her about the United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Justice DiBella found the Sullivans’ view of the evidence — that Zwarycz was only a janitor or superintendent — “not credible. [read post]