Search for: "WOLFE v STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 7:39 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
The Department of Labor also revamped the white collar exemptions from overtime pay. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 7:48 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
In other words, the United States (Department of Labor, et al.) as amicus curiae got it backwards with their argument that ERISA, not the plan, controls, and that the plan terms violated ERISA’s structure. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:50 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
Department of Labor? [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:35 am
Labor Department. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:42 pm
Labor Department. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:48 pm
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:36 am
Detecon, Inc., 515 F.3d 334, 340 (4th Cir.2008) (citing Wolf v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Department of Agriculture. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:58 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. and Joy P. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
They also discussed Doe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
This ten percent increase is financed by eliminating the National Endowment for the Arts, legal aid for the poor, low-income heating assistance, and AmeriCorps, as well as massive cuts in the departments of Agriculture, Labor, State, and the EPA. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
NLRB, which asks whether the National Labor Relations Board has the authority to decide labor-management disputes with only two sitting members. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the government’s recent “about-face” in Epic Systems “has created an extremely rare scenario: the Justice Department and National Labor Relations Board, a federal agency, will oppose each other in court”; he concludes that “[b]y all indications now, the case … looks like a 5-4 victory for employers. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:28 pm
With respect to the decision to issue a “Union Yes” plate, while the myriad issues pertaining to organized labor in the United States are social and political in nature, there is no basis to conclude that the Department failed to apply the policy against creating plates that touch upon contentious political issues as opposed to having applied the policy and merely reaching a different result than it did with the “Choose Life” plate. [read post]
