Search for: "WOODS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 41 - 60 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am by Stewart Baker
 So what is the Justice Department’s late-to-the-party contribution? [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman looks at Tuesday’s decision in Wood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In his book We The Judges (1956), Justice William O. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
Petition for certiorari Agents Wood and Savage, represented by Justice Department lawyers, took their case to the Supreme Court last July. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, the Department of Justice admitted yesterday that it inadvertently erred when, during the 2009 arguments in Nken v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:41 am by sally
Supreme Court Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Constantine, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2406 (26 October 2010) T, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (26 October 2010) Wakeling, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2210 (15 September 2010) Qayum, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2237 (16 September 2010) Cooper, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2335 (20 September 2010) Nuthoo, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2383… [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:53 am by Elliot Setzer
New documents in the criminal case of Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn were turned over by the Justice Department yesterday, writes the Washington Post. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Wood Fund for the Undergraduate Study of History. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Department of Treasury and Wood v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:28 am
Cook County Sheriff's Dept., 95 F.3d 548 (7th Cir. 1996) and Woods v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:23 am
Accordingly, said the Court of Appeals, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed . . . shocks the judicial conscience as a matter of law,” citing a number of decisions, including Matter of Will v Frontier Central School District Board. of Education. 97 NY2d 690, and Matter of Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222.The court observed that: “The Appellate Division has no discretionary authority or interest of justice jurisdiction in this… [read post]