Search for: "WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), and Desiano v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We've been doing some research in anticipation of the upcoming ALI meeting at which the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation will be voted on (we hope ALI members interested in class actions and the like will come out, debate the issues, and vote), and in the spirit of cross-fertilization, we thought we'd share it with our readers. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, was (predictably) a class action for economic loss. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir.2004)(extending Buckman's logic to a statute similar to Utah's), with Desiano v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2002), or the Second Circuit in Desiano v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:04 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), for the proposition that the Michigan fraud exception was also preempted under the U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Division of Amer [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., the court encountered the redoubtable (we would say, very doubtable) Dr. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961, 963-64 (6th Cir. 2004); Flynn v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Ayerst Laboratories, 548 A.2d 798, 802 n.6 (D.C. 1988). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 283 F.3d 315, 321 (5th Cir. 2002), and Williams v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:53 pm
The Second Circuit therefore vacated a plaintiff's verdict and directed the entry of judgment for the defendant.Similarly, Wyeth-Ayerst Labs. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:47 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 82 S.W.3d 849 (Ky. 2002).4. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:30 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 700000/98 Decided: March 27, 2007 Justice Charles Edward Ramos NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Ramos In motion seq. no. 007, Parker and Waichman LLP (P&W), on its own behalf and on behalf of its clients,... [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:57 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories KINGS COUNTYAdministrative Law Homeowner's Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies Bars Article 78 Relief; Petition Time-Barred Mishina v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 9:11 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004). [read post]