Search for: "Wagner v. Short"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 8:56 am
Yesterday morning, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
In the courts A.A. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Reliance was placed on the English case of Cartier International AG v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 4:49 am
Cohen, Cohen v Trump Org. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:38 pm
Adam Wagner provides a short post on the quote in its proper context here; the Education Secretary actually stated the law on this issue more accurately than previously suggested. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
See also Adam Wagner’s post: Do we need a UK Bill of Rights? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:05 pm
From Wysocki v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:30 pm
” He then cited what he described as EPA’s similar position in a 2001 case, Whitman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
Immigration law matters The Free Movement blog posted a short commentary on one specific aspect in the case of NA (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department : Section 55 of the Borders Act 2009 and enforcement measures concerning children. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
As Wagner C.J. stated at para. 160, “bankruptcy is not a licence to ignore rules”. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
See also Adam Wagner’s review of recent developments in terrorism law. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Procedural fumbling by supposedly the best lawyers money can buy sold Microsoft short. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
The short Easter legal term ended on 24 May 2018. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am
Human Rights in Ireland wrote a short introduction to the new blog which can be found here. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:36 am
Wagner was willing to remove an antidiscrimination provision from the Wagner Act to placate the AFL, which wanted to use its new power to exclude blacks, FDR was unwilling to support anti-lynching legislation, and so on (more examples can be found in my Only One Place of Redress book)—and 1964, when a significant majority of the white public supported Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The court said, “in terms of both the data and the methods concerned, the grounds for interference fall far short of the constitutionally required threshold of an identifiable danger. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Thanks to the Jubilee, it was a short week for most of us but there was still plenty happening in the world of human rights. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm
R (on the application of T) v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
The New York Court of Appeals, in its 1921 case Wagner v. [read post]
