Search for: "Wales v. Davies" Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Multilateralism v Bilateralism: What’s in it for international IP regulation? [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 3:44 am
Davis, 46 M.J. 551 (N-M. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
On 18 March 2015, Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Lachaux v AOL Ltd. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
Those rules have been in force in New South Wales and other Australian jurisdictions for a some years. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
(Calver, R (on the application of) v Public Services Ombudsman for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) (03 May 2012). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette and Wales Online have more information. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 Opposing him is Professor Stephen Davies, Sir Jack's successor as Waynflete Professor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford and a pretty legendary figure in his own right. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Mischon de Reya website has a post about the CJEU decision in WS v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
Professor of Law Director of Clinical Legal Education UC Davis School of Law Rosalind Dixon Professor of Law University of New South Wales Michael Dorf Robert S. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Vos C and Davis LJ) heard the appeal against the judgment of Warby J in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 13 January 2014, Nicola Davies J adjourned the application in the case of Styles v Photographer AAA and others to a CMC on 10 March 2014. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day a statement in open court was read out in the case of Davies v BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
” Merpel had just read the latest judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, in Resolution Chemicals Limited v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 3160 (Pat). [read post]