Search for: "Walker v. Appeal Council" Results 41 - 60 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Some decisions have gone further and treated allegations of verifiable fact as comment, see for instance the Privy Council in Jeyaretnam v Goh Chok Tong [1989] 1 WLR 1109. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
There are also two appeals in the Privy Council this week, commencing with Antonio Webster v The Attorney General of Trinidad & Tobago on Tuesday 14 June 2011 to be heard by Lord Phillips, Walker and Wilson. [read post]
  This has led to a steady stream of cases in which the Privy Council/Supreme Court has taken a different view to the Court of Criminal Appeal on the convention-compatibility of Scots law. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
The proceedings were transferred to the Administrative Court and stayed pending the appeal in Smith (On Behalf of the Gypsy Council) v Buckland [2007] EWCA Civ 1318. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
The policy of the 1980 Act (consolidated in the 1985 Act) was to permit transmission of a secure tenancy by way of succession once: see Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] 2 AC 262. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
The policy of the 1980 Act (consolidated in the 1985 Act) was to permit transmission of a secure tenancy by way of succession once: see Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] 2 AC 262. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
There are two appeals in the Supreme Court this week. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
By Leslie Walker On October 30, 2008, the California Supreme Court decided  Save Tara v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:17 pm
It is to be satisfied by the minimum award necessary to do justice (Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] Ch 179, 198), which may sometimes lead to no more than a monetary award. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Wednesday 23 November 2011 is the two day hearing of Sugar (Deceased) (Represented by Fiona Paveley) v BBC, which on appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Dyson. [read post]