Search for: "Walker v. Attorney General" Results 41 - 60 of 597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Attorney General v Universal Projects Limited and The Attorney General v Keron Matthews, heard 7 July 2011. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:38 am
The employment law Case of the Week is Walker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
The Privy Council will also hear the conjoined appeals of The Attorney General v Universal Projects Limited and The Attorney General v Keron Matthews on Thursday 7 July 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
Antonio Webster v The Attorney General of Trinidad & Tobago, heard 14 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:12 pm
Like Jeralyn, mcjoan has a good analysis of the just released Al Haramein v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Drama Over DOT Head's Departure; Stipulated Agreement Dictates Terms - Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Cruise Law News - The Most Popular Maritime Law Blog in the World - Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O'Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News The National Broadband Plan needs a… [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:06 pm
Walker basically accepted Ted Olson's strategy to put the pending Proposition 8 lawsuit, Perry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
’ If the other side is correct that the measure’s supporters lack standing, “then the court below [Judge Walker] likely lacked jurisdiction (and its judgment must therefore be vacated) because the Attorney General agreed that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional,”  the brief said. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
During its May term, an apparently skeptical Illinois Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Walker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:57 pm by Chris Attig
Weiner, Attorney at Argument [Chisholm, Chisholm and Kilpatrick]   VA Office of General Counsel Attorney: Anthony D. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since they failed to show that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of her legal malpractice cause of action (see Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d at 454; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d at 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d at 790). [read post]