Search for: "Walker v. Baker" Results 41 - 60 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
In the last couple of Conferences, when multiple cases have presented the same issue for the Court’s review, the Court has tipped its hand about its preferred vehicle before the actual grant by relisting it and “holding” the runner up (see, e.g., Walker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Blaine Baker and Donald Fyson 2012Arming and Disarming: A History of Gun Control in Canada by R. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
As a preliminary matter, the court concluded that each of the plaintiffs had standing as to at least one defendant, and the court declined to view Baker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
and the speakers are the all-too-infrequent IP Finance blogger Anne Fairpo (13 Old Square) and Kevin Phillips (no relation to this blogger) of Baker Tilly. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Today's conference on IP and Retail, organised by CLT and held in the elegant venue of London's Holborn Bars (right), opened with a paper by Abida Chaudri (Baker & McKenzie LLP), speaking on the protection of shop names and trade dress. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
  First, he concluded that the summary Supreme Court ruling in Baker v. [read post]