Search for: "Ware v. Ware"
Results 41 - 60
of 630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
On 28 October 2022 the journalist Paddy French issued a press release stating that he will take no further part in the Ware v French libel action but will concentrate on producing a full report on the BBC Panorama programme about the Labour Party and anti-semitism. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
IPSO 03055-22 Lane v walesonline.co.uk, 1 accuracy (2021), 3 harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 10567-22 Marson v express.co.uk, 1 accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies The co-founder of Jewish Voice for Labour, Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi, unreservedly apologized in open court to journalist John Ware for her false comments about his far-right political leanings which she made… [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am
Farah Pandith and Jacob Ware of the Council on Foreign Relations argue that women and children, who are typically portrayed as victims, are playing important roles in terrorist movements today and that counterterrorism needs to adapt accordingly. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Farah v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:27 am
Accordingly, the court held the buyer could not recover from the auctioneer.Cases like this highlight the importance of disclaimers by sellers and of due diligence by buyers.Twitter Issues Subpoenas in Dispute with Elon MuskThe Wall Street Journal quoted me in an article about the Twitter v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 11:54 am
In a recent Florida putative class action, Pariseau v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 are not… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:37 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, First Reference Editor In Canadian Pacific Railway v United Steelworkers – TC Local 1976 (“Canadian Pacific”), an employer’s dismissal of an employee who committed a safety infraction while intoxicated with cannabis was upheld as reasonable. [read post]
19 May 2022, 7:43 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law, Editor at First Reference In Nguyen v Central Stampings Limited (“Nguyen”), an employee’s feeling that an employer’s conduct derived from discriminatory intent due to his sex was not sufficient to obtain compensation for violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:13 am
The value of proper trademark management is the key takeaway in the recent Federal Court decision Milano Pizza Ltd. v 6034799 Canada Inc, 2022 FC 425. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law (third year), Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:13 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-law (last year), Editor First Reference Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm
South AfricaKoko v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for information… [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 10:28 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law (3rd year), Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:21 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student at Law (last year), Editor at First Reference In Turnbull v Edmonton Pipe Trades Educational Fund o/a Alberta Pipe Trade College (“Turnbull”), an employer discriminated against its employee in violation of the Alberta Human Rights Act when it dismissed her one day after learning of her high-risk pregnancy. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
Commodities: wares . . . b. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
2021 was another busy year on the legislative front; too much to cover in a single blog post. [read post]
