Search for: "Warner/Chappell Music, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
Summy, and ultimately to Warner/Chappell Music. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., No. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:46 am
Recently the Central District Court of California ruled that no copyright protection exists for the popular “Happy Birthday To You” song after several decades of dispute.[1] Marya, involved a class action suit against Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
Rather than paying the fee, the pair filed a lawsuit against Warner Chappell Music in 2013. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
Rather than paying the fee, the pair filed a lawsuit against Warner Chappell Music in 2013. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:28 am
At least if you paid them to Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., good news: you might be getting that money back. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
Vindication, I might add, for my colleague Bob Brauneis at GW Law School, who wrote a definitive debunking of the “Happy Birthday” copyright claims several years ago, but bad news for Warner/Chappell Music Inc., which reportedly has been collecting more than $2 million a year in royalties (!) [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:53 am
The rights to the song were bought for $15 million in 1988 by music publisher Warner/Chappell Music Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/3UTxmuGyf3 -> Woman sues Google claiming she lost “thousands” through Google Play Store hack http://t.co/EJRSGUkGu1 -> Google Inc almost bought Tesla Motors Inc in 2013 when the automaker was on the verge of bankruptcy http://t.co/EGFfoxHYGa -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-04-20: NZ global mode ISPs to be sued for copyright infringement ht… http://t.co/eT0z10P8Bn -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-04-20… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* Blurred Lines: sound-alike litigation in the music industry While the copyright dispute involving Robin Thicke and Marvin Gaye [see here and here] is entering the trial phase, Tom sinks his paws in the world of infringement in the music industries, between occasional similarities and copies that go beyond mere coincidence. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:37 pm
But now comes word via Techdirt that a class action suit has been filed by Good Morning to You, Inc. against Warner/Chappell Music, the entity that has been asserting copyright ownership over HBTY (and collecting those royalties). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:24 pm
The song allegedly generates at least $2 million a year in licensing fees for Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
YouTube, Inc., et. al. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:43 pm
of a recent motion to dismiss made by the defendants, Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and Summy-Burchard, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Dworkin http://t.co/LhLyNNZgfi -> Ban on most robocalls and text message spam gets stronger this month http://t.co/LhvxsEPe2M -> Patent goliath Intellectual Ventures looks to raise another $3 billion http://t.co/5Cf6lyK2NC -> European organizations file lawsuit against UK over vast digital surveillance http://t.co/6KHQw55qbJ -> Composing Consent: Federal Court Dismisses Pinto v BJEC http://t.co/wGf61eBGve -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-10-05: Computer and… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:58 am
However, currently Warner Chappel Music currently licenses the songs for commercial purposes to the tune of $2 million per year. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., and the American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers (ASCAP) paid the royalties to Anthony Sepe, who in turn gave half to his brother. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:26 am
Accordingly, Warner/Chappell has been demanding and collecting fees to license something it doesn’t own. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:20 pm
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:51 am
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., filed in the Southern District of New York where ownership of the well-known song "Happy Birthday to You" is under dispute. [read post]
