Search for: "Washington v. Case" Results 41 - 60 of 19,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
” Now before the Supreme Court a second time, Escobar argues first that his case “presents the same question as Glossip v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Lombardi (University of Washington School of Law; University of Washington - Henry. [read post]
Sharon Basch is a rising 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and a JURIST staff correspondent in Washington DC this summer. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
Simpson murder case nearly 20 years ago, it’s often difficult to avoid the day’s most followed legal stories. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
At the Philadelphia Convention and state ratifying conventions, and in public essays and private correspondence, Madison, Hamilton, Wilson, Washington, and other prominent nationalists emphasized both the need for federal power in cases of general interests, separate state incompetence, or regulatory disuniformity and the need to stop states from creating interstate problems. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:50 pm by Amy Howe
Applying the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
     I believe that the Supreme Court will decide Smith v. [read post]