Search for: "Washington v. Marks" Results 41 - 60 of 3,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
The rule was entitled “Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act” (commonly designated as 2021 IC Rule). 12 It marked a significant departure in emphasis from the economic reality test which the courts and the DOL previously adopted. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The official social media accounts for The Prince and Princess of Wales published a photograph of Kate Middleton with her three children to mark Mother’s Day. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:28 am by Rick Hasen
Mark Graber for the Washington Monthly: In deciding for Trump, the Supreme Court acquired no additional political capital that might be employed against progressive rights and institutions. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm by NARF
Missing the mark: How legislative adjustments to the disparagement clause could promote the revocation of trademarks for professional sporting teams referencing Native American culture. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]