Search for: "Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1" Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Morrison, George Washington University School of Law In Corner Post v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
District Court – Western District of Washington – Judge James L. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
MSN – Hannah Natanson (Washington Post) | Published: 1/22/2023 States and school districts nationwide have begun to constrain what librarians can order. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm by Gail Heriot
Seattle School District was itself based on Hunter v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
Seattle School District Number 1, the Supreme Court invalidated policies adopted by Seattle, Washington and Louisville, Kentucky that were designed to prevent public schools from becoming racially homogeneous. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm by Florian Mueller
Motorola antisuit injunction in the Western District of Washington that (for good reason) barred Motorola Mobility from enforcing a pair of Mannheim SEP injunctions. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The defendants initially removed the lawsuit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, but on December 9, 1965, District Court Judge Robert Tehan remanded the case to the state circuit court where trial was conducted by Circuit Court Judge and former Marquette Law School professor, Elmer W. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Monroe County Board of Educ. (1999) -- recognizing school district liability under Title IX for not preventing student-on-student sexual harrassmentSchenck v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
Seattle School District No. 1. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
  The case involves Cesar Sarausad, convicted of murder, attempted murder, and assault while armed with a gun in a shooting at a high school in Seattle  growing out of gang rivalry. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]