Search for: "Weeks v. Workforce Safety & Insurance"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
The FLSA requires that covered, non-exempt employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm
Stamer also is deeply involved in helping to influence the Affordable Care Act and other health care, pension, social security, workforce, insurance and other policies critical to the workforce, benefits, and compensation practices and other key aspects of a broad range of businesses and their operations. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
The definition of “essential health benefits” as implemented by the Tri-Agency regulations is complicated and generally varies by state, even when the group health plan is self-insured. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
As proposed, this would raise the salary threshold from $455 a week ($23,660 a year) to a projected level of $970 a week ($50,440 a year) in 2016. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
Burwell decision last week. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
Boucher received 20 weeks of pay in lieu of notice. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:48 pm
According to the EEOC’s lawsuit in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Medrick v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm
NLRB’s Challenge To Arizona Constitution’s Secret Ballot Provision In NLRB v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Under a judgment entered in Solis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
Notably in the Vita Cortex case, payment of the statutory redundancy for the occupying workers was expedited by the government some several weeks faster than the average claim for statutory redundancy from the Social Insurance Fund (an action which may now set some precedent). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:49 pm
Based on the unreported earnings, the Workforce Safety & Insurance contended it had paid $ 24,132.85 in excess benefits. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.New York - NY DOL issues revised WARN regulationsBond Schoeneck & KingEarlier this year, we posted on the New York State Department of Labor's new regulations governing New York's WARN Act, the state statute that requires certain employers to provide 90 days notice to employees, their employees'… [read post]
