Search for: "Wells v. Hand"
Results 41 - 60
of 21,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
On 23 April 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the appeal arising from the January 2023 decision of Meade J in AIM v Supponor [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
Walking up to the court at 8 AM, there were only a handful of protesters, and I recognized some from when I attended arguments in February in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
" Kavanaugh praised Justice Scalia's Morrison dissent, as well as Justice Robert H. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm
NetChoice Oral Arguments In NetChoice v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm
See Spears v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Expert witnesses must not only use a reliable methodology, Rule 702(d) requires that they must reliably apply their chosen methodology to the facts at hand in reaching their conclusions.[16] The MDL court concluded that Wells’ meta-analysis was not sufficiently reliable under Rule 702 because he failed faithfully and reliably to apply his own articulated methodology. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
When Trump assumed office in 2017, he and his associates did not have such well developed policies and personnel in waiting. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
Well, if well-established principles of EU design law were applied correctly, and in the correct order, this inevitably would lead (and eventually lead) to the only rightful outcome in the case at hand – lack of validity of the contested RCD.Accordingly, there are a total of five steps to be taken when assessing the validity (more specifically: individual character) of a design, namely (i) determining the subject matter of the contested RCD, preferably by identifying… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
On the other hand, the Defense has a fundamental right to a fair trial and a due process right to effectively prepare its case under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well Sixth Amendment confrontation rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
It merely injects fear in those assigned or called to participate in the proceedings, that not only they, but their family members as well are ‘fair game’ for Defendant’s vitriol. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
The new guide maintains a handful of other idiosyncrasies from the past as well. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
, Griswold v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
China is alsoconcerned that the Middle East is well within the U.S. sphere of influence, and differences overthe region could precipitate a U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision in Meinecke v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:42 am
But well played. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
Arizona v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
EU Member States’ courts will need to assess this factual question as well as the thorny question of assigning a monetary value to this “fear”, on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
Corp. v. [read post]
