Search for: "Wells v. Gillette" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Bart Torvik
It is perhaps somewhat less well known that his love of cats has infected his judicial decision making to an alarming degree.For example, take Judge Posner's opinion in yesterday's en banc opinion, Markadonatos v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:09 am by Bart Torvik
Fan(s)™ of my Platinum Coin series surely knew where I stood on the latest challenge to Obamacare, King v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:11 am by Bart Torvik
The Supreme Court today issued another opinion (American Express v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
See Gillett-Netting v Barnhart (9th Cir 2004) 371 F3d 593 (Arizona law). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:04 pm by WSLL
Appellant contends that the district court’s conclusion that he lacked standing to commence suit against the City of Gillette (City) as well as its 22,221 eligible voting citizens for damaging his freedom of speech, is erroneous.Issues: Whether the district court erred when it dismissed Appellant’s complaint for lack of standing.Holdings: The Court concludes that Appellant does not have standing to bring this appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Copeland-Chatterson Co. (1906), 37 S.C.R. 651 at 653; Gillette v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am by Adam Wagner
Updated – Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 - Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal to  unanimously hold that the defence of fair comment should be open to a booking agent which said on its website that a Motown tribute band, the Gillettes, were “unprofessional”. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:22 am by Philipp Widera
Legal background regarding Arrow-declarations The underlying jurisdiction was established in Arrow Generics v Merck & Co Inc [2007] FSR 39 and approved by the Court of Appeal in Fujifilm v AbbVie [2017] EWCA Civ. 1. [read post]