Search for: "Wells v. McKenzie"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Initial inaccurate reports were repeated and embellished long after Secret Barristers correction (below) emerged, even by well-regarded publishers and broadcasters. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
Well done @DN_Child – hard work but worth it! [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
The fact that O’Connor v Aldershot Magistrates Court [2016] EWHC 2792 (Admin)involved the founder of the well-known family law campaigning group Fathers4Justice adds interest, though not relevance, to the case. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
Perhaps the great unregulated covet such things instead of actual qualifications, like this McKenzie friend with his “proper solicitors briefcase”? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
thought that the numbers had dropped, everything was well. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:55 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:37 pm
The claimant was a former Conservative councillor who now works as a McKenzie Friend and runs a blog which sometimes deals with child protection matters. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:11 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
MC: Well in some cases you have to. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 am
The set up in McKenzie v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:50 am
Facts: In this case (McKenzie v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
The duty can extend to negligent omissions as well as the performance of negligent acts. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 2:38 pm
It could not be said that the metal plate over which plaintiff tripped which was no more than one-half inch higher than the floor had "none of the characteristics of a trap or a snare (McKenzie v Crossroads Arena, LLC, 291 AD2d 860 [4th Dept 2002]). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:17 am
[Article 2.2 of the Services Directive expressly excludes a number of services from its scope, including "(d) services in the field of transport, including port services, falling within the scope of Title V of the Treaty". [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:05 pm
Lowe, 2012 BCSC 1482 ($35,000); McKenzie v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
A more recent Ninth Circuit decision in E & J Gallo Winery v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:26 am
The explosive growth of these firms has left them short of experience – especially with inadequate numbers of “no-hair, gray haired” partners with well-seasoned judgment. [read post]
