Search for: "Wells v. National Indemnity Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am
MGIC Indemnity Corp., 823 F.2d 276, 280-82 (9th Cir. 1986) and Gon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Dammann & Co., 594 F.3d 238, 253 (3d Cir. 2010):[W]e have exercised restraint in accordance with the well-established principle that where two competing yet sensible interpretations of state law exist, we should opt for the interpretation that restricts liability, rather than expands it, until the Supreme Court of [that state] decides differently.Lexington National Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:23 am
Kirschenheiter and National Indemn. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 2:18 pm
In Reliance National Indemnity Co., L&T Joint Venture and Lamar Construction Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:00 am
The National Football League, et al., Index No. 804088/2014 (Erie Co. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOTT, M.D.; from Lubbock County; 7th district (07-06-00075-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-25-08)08-0241 GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
Everest National Insurance Co., the Ninth Circuit rejected the policyholder’s argument that the potential for vicarious liability under Section 12940 was sufficient to shield a judgment from Section 533’s preclusion. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Curiouser and curiouser.Well, Conte is an end run around the heart of modern product liability, which was created - not just for California but for the nation - in Greenman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 pm
In Geico Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:11 am
” These well-established principles of indemnity and insurable interests apply to all insurance claims under policies that are not “valued policies. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Chapter 94 of Larson’s , which discusses this important subject, has been revised as well. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
National Drug Co., 23 A.2d 743 (Pa. 1942), long before the concept of §402A strict liability in tort was even a gleam in a plaintiff’s lawyer’s eye. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:11 am
Yeda Research & Development Co. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878), but it’s so old and out of date we’re not going to discuss it further.The current rule, articulated by two ironically named cases, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
