Search for: "Wells v. Wagner et al" Results 41 - 51 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
STEVEN WYNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Rheingold et al proudly write, "Not only did the court deny all pending motions, he denied all future ones! [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]