Search for: "West v. Genuine Parts Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This is Part 4 (Data, Discretion, and Analytics in the Administrative State-Economic Enterprise Complex) which considers 2019 as the year that data driven governance, and the legal management of administrative and political decision making became a political, human rights and trade issue. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
It was later revealed that, at the time, Ivanka was “nearing a licensing deal” with a company that was “wholly owned by the Japanese government. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
See Part 1 and Part 2. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm
The water crept out of Buffalo Bayou and into West Houston's Energy Corridor, home to numerous energy companies and residential neighborhoods. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
Its purveyors have no intention of passing it off as genuine KF. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
At stake is genuine academic freedom and civil discourse. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
V, 1292b] These insights apply, I believe, with equal force to the constitution of a law for corporate codes. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
GINN-LA WEST END, LIMITED, ROBERT F. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:57 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
App. 1981) (the “fact [the prescriber] failed to read the package inserts and PDR negates any possible negligence on the part of [the manufacturer] in not emphasizing the hazards in those publications”); Cronin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Woo, Fenwick & West, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellant. [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm
Rakusen v Jepson borne in mind. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
To remove a case on a “color of office” argument, the removing party bears the burden of establishing what’s called the three-part “Mesa test,” from the Supreme Court case by that name,[5] The three-part test requires the defendant to show they: were an “officer, or any person acting under that officer, of the United States” are facing criminal charges “for or relating to any act under color of such office”; and have raised or… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:14 pm
See Gallegos v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Techdirt reports that a US law firm has been fined $71,000 for filing legal claims based on false documents as part of a ‘reputation management strategy. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Bush was elected and worked in the West Wing for five years, first as a counsel to the president and then as staff secretary to the president. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Heck v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
