Search for: "Whittaker Appeal" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Since our last round up, Mrs Justice Sharp has been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:44 am
Apr 12, 2012 17 from BYU Law receive clerkships with federal courts of appeal, federal district courts, & state supreme courts--4th in a series of interviews: Chris Whittaker [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:28 am by Jonathan Bailey
May has the ability to override any court decision on the matter but has decided to not intervene in the case, leaving the appeal, which is to be heard soon, to be the final word on the matter. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:56 am by Jonathan Bailey
AFACT has promised to move forward with lobbying efforts to alter copyright law in Australia. 2: YouTube Faces Massive Music Royalty Bill in German Copyright Case Next up today, Zack Whittaker at ZdNet reports that YouTube has lost a potentially major court case in Germany and may be facing a very high bill for royalties. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Kennedy, the impeccably credentialed Hastie seemed like the obvious front-runner for the spot made vacant by Justice Charles Whittaker's decision to retire. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
The appeal will be heard on Tuesday 3 April 2012. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:16 am by admin
Max Whittaker for The Wall Street Journal   Four months ago, Ky Nguyen was paying about $6,000 a month in rent for his small, 1,600 square-foot dental office, part of a mostly vacant strip mall in Manteca, Calif. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail) [2011] EWCA Civ 1617 (21 December 2011)… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:29 am by Francis Davey
In the Summer Dave and David Smith posted about the case of Kinnear v Whittaker in the High Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm by Dave
  The problem is that Bean J went on to argue that, although it is extraordinary not to have a decided case on this point ([34]), these types of case (on proprietary estoppel and constructive trust) are fact-sensitive (perhaps sensing the possibility of an appeal). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by David Smith
Therefore the appeal was not actually about the estoppel issue at all but was really about whether there was a substantial dispute. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:08 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681 (09 June 2011) KM, R (on the application of) v Cambridgeshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 682 (09 June 2011) Wright (A Child) v Cambridge Medical Group [2011] EWCA Civ 669 (09 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stringer v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1396 (09 June 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) E & Ors, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Rob Robinson
Hawley Postscript: Bad Facts Don’t Help on Appeal - http://tinyurl.com/4xl8hdb (John Tredennick) Recovering eDiscovery Costs as a Prevailing Party - http://tinyurl.com/3oxuc6v (Christine Soares) Riding the Waves of Early Case Assessment - http://tinyurl.com/67zu9x4 (George Rudoy) Safe Harbor: Why EU Data Needs 'Protecting' from US Law - http://tinyurl.com/43r27gf (Zack Whittaker) Should Government Agencies Be Able To Exempt Themselves From The Privacy Act? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:59 am by Mandelman
According to the AP story: Farkas’ attorney, Bruce Rogow, said he was disappointed in the verdict and plans to appeal. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit 2010) – in which the defense of outrageous government conduct was one of several issues the defendant raised on appeal. [read post]