Search for: "Wife W. v. Husband W." Results 41 - 60 of 415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am by Rachel Casper
– – (2019)(attorneys violated Rules 1.9 & 1.10, where attorney representing husband in divorce left her law practice and joined attorney who was representing wife in divorce and both attorneys thereafter continued to represent wife without obtaining informed consent from husband). [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am by Russell Knight
“Whenever a devise, conveyance, assignment, or other transfer of homestead property maintained or intended for maintenance as a homestead by both husband and wife together during coverture shall be made and the instrument of devise, conveyance, assignment, or transfer expressly declares that the devise or conveyance is made to persons, named and expressly identified in that instrument as husband and wife, not as joint tenants or tenants in common but as… [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
Emoji were also in the limelight in a case before the State Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
In 2014, [Husband] travelled to Jordan, where [Wife] resided and w here the parties were married in an Islamic Ceremony on December 22, 2014. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
The ex-wife of the group’s founder, David Stone, characterized her former husband’s beliefs as religiosity that spiraled out of control. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 7:52 am by Steve Gottlieb
My wife and I have now celebrated 54 as husband and wife, and we had a lovely dinner brought to our door. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
             The Court found that the husband met his prima facie burden of establishing his entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the wife’s counterclaim alleging adultery (see Westervelt v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 5:53 am by Russell Knight
Gilmore, 372 U.S. 53, 1963 Furthermore, IRS documents have subsequently advised that “[g]enerally, attorney’s fees and other costs paid in connection with a divorce, separation, or decree for support are not deductible by either the husband or the wife. [read post]