Search for: "Williams v. CCHS" Results 41 - 60 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2015, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), but also affirmed the trial court’s ruling that a now-defunct constructive discharge claim notice requirement in D.C. law was inapplicable to the present case regardless of whether the underlying conduct occurred while the notice provision was in effect (Williams v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming the district court’s judgment, the appeals court determined that probable cause had not existed for the officer’s arrest and that a reasonable official would have known that omitting pertinent information and including inaccurate information in an affidavit supporting the arrest warrant, in an effort to punish that officer, would violate clearly established constitutional rights (Williams v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
However, her failure to accommodate claim failed because an employer is not required to accommodate an employee that it merely “regards as” disabled (Williams v Baltimore City Community College, September 23, 2014, Russell, G, III). [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Chief Justice Riley partially dissented, suggesting that there were triable issues as to the existence of an integrated enterprise (Davis v Ricketts, August 27, 2014, Shepherd, B). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s holdings in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v Williams, the Iowa Supreme Court majority explained that it did not agree with the employee’s contention that the 2008 amendments required it to interpret the state law to include the disorder. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
” In doing so, Congress deliberately sought to overturn Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
It protects the expression of ideas in these works, rather than ideas in and of themselves: CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
While his relationship book addressed an issue of public concern, the appeals court determined that the school district’s interest in ensuring effective delivery of counseling services outweighed his speech interest (Craig v Rich Township High School District 227, December 3, 2013, Williams, A). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:50 am by Lorene Park
The employer failed to provide competent evidence supporting its defense that the supervisor treated everyone poorly (Williams v Shred-It). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Chief Judge Wood dissented from the circuit judges’ vote denying rehearing en banc, joined by Judges Williams and Hamilton. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing the dismissal of a second lawsuit filed by an employee asserting Rehabilitation Act claims against a private company that she claimed fired her due to her disability, the Seventh Circuit explained that a plaintiff seeking relief against a private recipient of federal funds is not required to exhaust the administrative remedies provided under the Act (Williams v Milwaukee Health Services, Inc, October 10, 2013, Posner, R). [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm by Lorene Park
As illustrated by Williams v FedEx Corp Serv, there are many ways that supervisors can take the wrong steps and, if that happens, an employer may end up paying for defamation, invasion of privacy, or other claims. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:22 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
In Wang v Hearst Corp, a federal judge in New York refused to certify a Rule 23 class of magazine interns who alleged they should have been deemed “employees” and compensated accordingly. [read post]