Search for: "Williams v. Chicago Housing Authority" Results 41 - 60 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
Alistair MacDonald, William Mauldin and Ann M. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Clinton Presidential Library and Museum Adam Bergfeld, Archivist, the William J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
’”7 However, the Courts has applied the same “police power” analysis to constitutional challenges to condemnations by both state and federal condemning authorities, whether citing the Fourteenth or Fifth Amendment. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a Zimbabwean Chiefdom,… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
Stat. secs. 201.430-440, which restrict bawdy house advertising. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 February 2019 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Rochester v Ingham House Ltd. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
On 20 to 23 February 2023 Heather Williams J heard the trial in the case of Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  The first holder of that office was William MacCracken, a 1911 graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, who had served as a flight trainer during World War I, had chaired the American Bar Association’s Committee on the Law of Aeronautics since its creation in 1920, and helped draft the Air Commerce Act after studying European air ministries. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
The Senate has twice conducted impeachment trials after the targeted official had left office, either by expulsion (Senator William Blount in 1797) or resignation (Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]