Search for: "Williams v. US Postal Service"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
-Gary V. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
The Circuit Court said that while it did not generally have jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board, it did have jurisdiction over this type of “mixed case,” citing Wiggins v US Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
Proposition: no one should use data from email because it’s private like postal mail. 62% agreed. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:36 am
Postal Service at a repair and maintenance facility in Philadelphia as a garage man. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
Yet during the "unreviewed" Q3 2009 10-Q conference call, Patrick Byrne praised PricewaterhouseCoopers saying: Price gave us great service. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Haverhill, MA; Matthew Postal, President) Bay State Flag Football League Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Postal Service (which employed one of the plaintiffs), Social Security Administrator Michael J. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:15 am
See Williams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereGross v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with Article 25 of… [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Because she filed this lawsuit almost seven months after the Postal Service denied her claim, because the Act requires claimants to file their claims within six months of the agency's written denial of the claim and because her alternative readings of the Act are unconvincing, we affirm. 08a0240p.06 2008/07/03 USA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Because she filed this lawsuit almost seven months after the Postal Service denied her claim, because the Act requires claimants to file their claims within six months of the agency's written denial of the claim and because her alternative readings of the Act are unconvincing, we affirm. 08a0240p.06 2008/07/03 USA v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Having determined that the due process requirement was no longer viable in light of the Supreme Court's decision in N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
Olds is a mail carrier for the United States Postal Service. [read post]
