Search for: "Wine v. Wine"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2008, 7:40 pm
Will Indiana producers and consumers be able to participate, particularly given the August 7th 7th Circuit opinion in Baude v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:56 pm
Back in 2020, we covered National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
Alvi's Drift Wine International v. von Stiehl Winery, Cancellation No. 92058100 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential}.Respondent asserted that NAUGHTY GIRL does not immediately convey any knowledge about the ingredients, qualities, functions, features or characteristics of wine. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:04 am
Kohnstam, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 3:25 am
Kohnstam, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:04 am
Koch v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm
Justice Alito announces opinion in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:21 am
That was my introduction to the daily video blog winelibrarytv.comI then realized Gary had great deals on wine, and offered a daily specialNow let me tell you about my close, personal relationship with Gary V (as he is known): I've met him once, for about 2 minutes. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
" Palm Bay Imp., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
For those that wonder what matters to frequent online purchasers of wine, here goes: [1] I'm done with Parker score v. price. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 4:35 pm
"Here, via the ILB, is the 36-page opinion in Cherry Hill Vineyards v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:17 am
Writing for the majority, South Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Toal has penned an important opinion that affects how every beer & wine permit holder should do business in South Carolina.In Hartfield v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:47 pm
Tinder the end of August in the case of Baude v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:20 am
Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:42 am
Wine and cheese will be served. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:18 am
In re V & C, LLC, Serial No. 86321427 (May 8, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos).Mere Descriptiveness: The Board has held that Italian is a common modern language for purposes of the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:23 am
While the district court erred by not affording the plaintiff's geographically descriptive mark the statutory presumption of secondary meaning, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling on the ground that the plaintiff had not demonstrated that a likelihood of confusion between the two marks.More detail of Leelanau Wine Cellars, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:47 am
Wine was also the topic of the 2005 Supreme Court case Granholm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:59 pm
They disclosed that they owned the wine, but did not disclose the value of the wine collection. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
The Court accepted the approach, laid down by the same Court in New Media Publishing (Pty) Ltd v Eating Out Web Services, that the appropriate test is to consider whether the combined effect of the resemblance of the marks on the one hand and the goods or services on the other results in a likelihood of deception or confusion. [read post]
