Search for: "Winning v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The Panopticon blog had a post on the CJEU announcing that judgment will be handed down in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland & Schrems on 16 July 2020. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
OPDP: Surveillance/communication program, including response to voluntary requests for comment on draft materials; industry guidance; social science research program (researches issues on DTC and advertising to physicians—learn about studies on their website); review of disseminated materials/ “BadAd” program/warning or untitled letters; work with DOJ to pursue enforcement actions. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 3:15 am
@gowlingwlg_ca 2020-01-08 Finding Justice in a Tangled Web: Comity and the Future of Internet Governance https://t.co/5AWolDvwHP 2020-01-09 Summary judgment appropriate for defamation on social media Skafco Limited v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 3:15 am
@gowlingwlg_ca 2020-01-08 Finding Justice in a Tangled Web: Comity and the Future of Internet Governance https://t.co/5AWolDvwHP 2020-01-09 Summary judgment appropriate for defamation on social media Skafco Limited v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Naked Security had a post “Report: Use of AI surveillance is growing around the world”. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
Big Law Business had an article “Dershowitz Wins Unsealing of Epstein-Related Defamation Case&rdq [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
There is a post on the Security Law Blog. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
Google, or who debated the Blizzard v. bnetd DMCA case with me back in the day. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
It described the decisions as “minor win” for the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
Anthony Yang, representing the respondent, Nancy Berryhill, the acting social security commissioner, also argued in favor of a separate cap. [read post]
