Search for: "Woodford v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2014, 11:23 am
" Woodford v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Woodford is a habeas case on its way back from a remand from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:17 am
Woodford, 299 F.3d 868, Earlier coverage of the Idaho lawsuit begins in the preceding post. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Pinholster and Woodford v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
The great state of Oklahoma is not O.K. with the Tenth Circuit’s holding that the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals clearly violated Beck v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
S. 320, 333, n. 7 (1997), and “demands that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt,” Woodford v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Sanders v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Williams 13-587Issue: Whether the court of appeals exceeded its authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus when it completely disregarded and ignored this Court’s well-established precedent of Woodford v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Mast v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Hope Avenue, Suite 320 Bangor, ME 04401 Phone: (207) 941-2952 Fax: (207) 941-2955 E-mail: bobbijo.yeager@ucpofmaine.org MAINE STATE RESOURCES AGING Eastern Agency on Aging 450 Essex Street Bangor, ME 04401 Phone: (207) 941-2865; (800) 432-7812 (Toll Free in-state only) Web: http://www.eaaa.org Bureau of Elder and Adult Services State House, Station 11 Augusta, ME 04333 Phone: (207) 624-5335; (800) 750-5353 (Toll Free) Fax: (207) 623-1797 Web:… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064 (9thCir. 2005) ..............................................5, 46, 52 Bethea v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:52 pm
Bittaker v. [read post]
