Search for: "Wool, in Re"
Results 41 - 60
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2008, 6:59 am
Worden reports FindLaw may have pulled the wool out from under these lawyers. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:08 am
In re Siny Corp., Appeal No. 2018-1077 (Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:09 am
We're just over 1/2 way through the legislative session, and there continues to be a push to limit consumers' rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:31 pm
The Board relied on the case of In re U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:21 pm
Schmuer's tantrum, far easier.It could be only a matter of hours before the Republicans re-take the mantle of "Stupid Party," but for now, the Democrats have it all to themselves. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:36 pm
This slick wool overcoat will look great with all your suits. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:14 am
In an installation entitled Whose Coat is that Jacket You’re Wearing? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
No animal that grows wool may appear upon the dinner-table; it is forbidden there to slay the young of the goat; but it is lawful to feed on the flesh of man! [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:56 am
In re Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc., Serial No. 77455710 (January 11, 2013) [precedential].An applicant may overcome an ornamentality refusal in any of three ways: (1) by proving inherent distinctiveness; (2) by establishing acquired distinctiveness; or (3) by showing that the mark is registered for other goods or services, and thus that the applied-for mark serves as a secondary source indicator. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 1:38 pm
That’s why we’re supporting this rule and that’s why we’re asking you to do so too. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:50 am
” Organic wool producers would no longer be able to inflict “mulesing” on sheep, the brutal removal of strips of skin from the animal’s backside. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
Seeing that once again members of the SEC were refusing to answer legislators' questions and statements about what had happened, Ackerman said, "We're talking to ourselves and you're pretending to be here. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:57 am
We see this problem every day: people think that fur is morally different from leather, wool, or silk; they think that meat is morally different from other animal products. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:44 am
You're a Yuppie, professional or other generic dweeb between the ages of 22 and 82. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 5:59 am
Even dyed-in-the-wool Democrat James Carville has said: “You know, look…you’re smart enough to see this. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:59 pm
No, we don't have time to go over all of this again; we're working stiffs like you. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:25 pm
If you’re not certain of what’s being performed by the investment agent you’re working with, consult with an attorney experienced in securities and investments and fraud. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 8:14 am
Wool, silk or polypropylene inner layers hold more body heat than cotton does. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:48 pm
Problem number two, even if they were racist, putting a racist work on display doesn’t mean you’re “endorsing” racism. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 1:02 pm
You’re welcome. [read post]
