Search for: "Word v. Ham"
Results 41 - 60
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2017, 11:12 am
” Wood v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:12 am
” Wood v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
Ham v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
After all, shouldn’t every federal agency be allowed to make crimes at will, because they have dragons to slay, and it would be way too much work for Congress to do its job legislating such a big, complicated country like the United States without unelected back-office elves coming up with tens of thousands of ways to put people in prison for doing horrible things like selling “Turkey Ham” as “Ham Turkey” or with the words “Turkey”… [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 7:55 am
On the other hand, as Judge Kozinski said in reference to another case, “[i]n the Age of YouTube, there’s no need to take [either party’s] word for it”. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:41 pm
Consider the apparently ham-handed behavior of the new supervisors in the cases below: Insubordinate shoulder shrug. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
One judge has had enough, and his words offer some great lessons. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Allowing plaintiffs to pursue claims under consumer protection statutes in prescription medical product liability litigation is trying to pound a square peg into a ham sandwich. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:05 am
The 26-page complaint (full text) in Attali v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
This type of facial challenge, which is restricted to cases implicating the 1st Amendment, requires a court to assess the wording of the statute — without reference to the defendant’s conduct’ (People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:51 am
Jones), and in favor of the more recent "neutral principles" standard of Jones v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
This type of facial challenge, which is restricted to cases implicating the 1st Amendment, requires a court to assess the wording of the statute -- without reference to the defendant's conduct’ (People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm
The StreetView case — Google v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm
The StreetView case — Google v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:59 am
Murphy said repeatedly he didn’t believe the testimony Officer Thomas V. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 am
Would you like mustard on that ham sandwich? [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
When Kraft learned that CBOCS planned to sell a variety of food products, such as packaged hams in grocery stores under its logo, “Cracker Barrel Old Country Store” (the last three words are in smaller type in the logo), Kraft filed this lawsuit. [read post]
