Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
Mr Justice Lewison was Knighted in 2003.Previous convictions include Confetti Records v Warner (the "shizzle my nizzle" case, in which the learned judge found that rap was a foreign language, and O2 v Hutchinson -- one of the longest trade mark judgments of the pre-Arnold J era ... [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:05 pm
As suggested in our earlier post, the Minister did make a “Pepper v Hart” statement about this clause, saying “My hon. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
The House of Lords opinions in Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 were handed down today. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am
Comment This appeal is of general public and constitutional importance because the Supreme Court will have an opportunity to review the seminal judgment in Anisminic and offer guidance on the form of words parliament may use to oust the jurisdiction of the courts. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
In Actavis v Lilly, Lord Neuberger was keen to follow Germany, which was subsequently watered down in Warner Lambert and, now, more so. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Norris v United States [2010] UKSC 9 SC (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Judge, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr) 24 February 2010 In determining whether interference with an individual’s right to a family life was justified to achieve the aim of extradition, the court should not consider whether the circumstances were exceptional but should consider whether the consequences… [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:03 pm
It seems unlikely that the rational and restrained approach of the Neuberger Committee is going to be the last word. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
” With these words Lord Sumption begins the systematic demolition of an edifice first constructed in 1908 in Poulton v Adjustable Cover and Boiler Block Co, and subsequently extended in Coflexip v Stolt (2004), Unilin v Berry (2007) and in this case, Virgin v Zodiac (2009). [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 4:28 pm
On 21 December 2022 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Briggs, Hamblen and Leggatt) granted the defendant permission to appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
Internet Defamation and Choice of Law in Dow Jones v Gutnick Yet another article originally published in the 2003 issue of... [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
Words matter. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:30 am
An advance alert from Oxford Journal brings word of the posting of Judicial Intervention in Early Corporate Governance Disputes: Vice-Chancellor Shadwell’s Lost Judgment in Mozley v Alston (1847), by Victoria Barnes in the American Journal of Legal History:Mozley v Alston is usually used in Anglo-American corporate law as an authority to demonstrate the premise that courts are reluctant to intervene in disputes between shareholders and directors. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Collins agreed with Lord Walker and Lady Hale, and added some reflections of his own. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
In Lord v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Lucas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
