Search for: "Word v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm
Only two years ago, the Supreme Court held in Riley v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:03 am
Each time a person gets a paycheck, some of that money is taken out and given to the Social Security Administration (SSA) funds. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:49 am
This conviction was sorely tested by the flagrant and persistent defiance of prohibition, as well as by the repressive criminal and administrative techniques used to secure prohibition's enforcement. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
Subsequently, respondent applied to the Social Security Administration (SSA) and received long-term disability benefits on thebasis of his HIV status. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
— First Amendment to the Constitution “The phrase ‘Congress shall make no law’ is composed of plain words, easily understood. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Employees in the Labor Class were required to participate in Social Security regardless of their membership in ERS.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08610.htmHistorical Note: Eligibility to participate in Social Security was made available to public employees of the State of New York pursuant to an agreement between the State and the Social Security Administration as… [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Employees in the Labor Class were required to participate in Social Security regardless of their membership in ERS.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08610.htmHistorical Note: Eligibility to participate in Social Security was made available to public employees of the State of New York pursuant to an agreement between the State and the Social Security Administration as… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:15 am
Rutgers law professor Jon Dubin has an article in the latest Administrative Law Review entitled "Overcoming Gridlock: Campbell after a Quarter-Century and Bureaucratically Rational Gap-Filling in Mass Justice Adjudication in the Social Security Administration's Disability Programs" (follow this link to read an executive summary or download a free pdf of the article). [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:08 pm
Additional Resources: Social Security Administration Seeks Shortcut Through Massive Disability Backlog, May 6, 2016, Huffington Post, Arthur Delaney More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Related Cases: Van Buren v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Two words: Chevron deference. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:30 pm
The law says that the Social Security Administration (SSA) will look to see if alcohol or drug use is a contributing factor that is material to the disabling impairment(s). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
" As experienced Social Security disability attorneys who have represented thousands of disability benefits claimants in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, we know all too well that sometimes the Social Security Administration (SSA), its experts and even its judges just plain get it wrong. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
A Texas District Court recently issued an opinion, in Utah v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Biden and the First Amendment on the Just Security Podcast. [read post]
