Search for: "Y. N.E. M." Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
In light of the split of authority, if a defendant wants the state to agree not to prosecute crime X in exchange for a guilty plea to crime Y, and if crime X could potentially be prosecuted in a different district than crime Y, it may be advisable to get the district attorney for both districts to sign off on the agreement. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:22 pm by Randazza
Dept. of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:22 pm by Randazza
Dept. of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
Code, § 700; In re Thelen LLP (2014) 20 N.E.3d 264, 270–271 [“no law firm has a property interest in future hourly legal fees because they are ‘too contingent in nature and speculative to create a present or future property interest’ ”].) [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 034-2009 (EXPANDED) FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received assorted beef products that have been recalled by JBS Swift Beef Company. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
City of Chicago , 104 N.E. 1104 (1914). [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Mays, 161 Ohio App.3d 175, 829 N.E.2d 773 (Ohio App. 2005). [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
., LLC, 26 N.Y.3d 801, 48 N.E.3d 937, 28 N.Y.S.3d 656 (2016) (affirming exclusion of Kramer); The Little Hocking Water Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
I therefore thought I'd blog the text of the draft brief here, and invite all of you to tell me why I'm wrong altogether, why I'm wrong on specific details, how the proposal could be improved, or even what parts of the proposal seem likely to be confusing to the judges. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Here’s what the trial judge had to say to Smith’s court-appointed guardian with respect to the post-guardianship marriage between Smith and Martinez: [M]y concern for you, Mr. [read post]