Search for: "Yoo v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am by SHG
Burger, 482 US. 69] (1987), temporary baggage seizures, United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Summit Asset Strategies Investment Management, LLC; Summit Asset Strategies Wealth Management, LLC; and Chris Yoo Case Number: 15-cv-01429 (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington) Date Filed: September 4, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 6, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-144 SEC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Yoo (University of Pennsylvania) (Yoo presenting Bannerman’s paper, followed by responses from Bannerman) First, idea of “development” in IP discourse has changed over time; initially not focused on economic growth but did become so over time. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
United States (University of Washington Press) by Gordon K. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm by Ryan Scoville
They acknowledge that the United States “already has the world’s most serious export controls in place. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am by Ken White
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
First, the administration contends that the United States is in a state of armed conflict with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am by Julian Ku
  It is a law of the United States, which authorizes courts to apply domestic American law to activities with some substantial connection to the United States. [read post]