Search for: "Z T v. Review Board" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) Test your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which one of these three 2(d) refusals did the board reverse? [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
The Fed says as part of its proposal that it will review the new cap every other year. . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council, heard 11 May 2017. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The second judgment to be handed down is R (on the application of Z and another) (AP) v Hackney London Borough Council and Anr . [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
International Cheese Council of Canada (Canadian Trademark Blog) Copyright Board rejects bid for transactional licences (Michael Geist) Re:Sound not soundly defeated just yet: Re:Sound v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09  (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought  by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
The other day we put up a piece about a Twombly/Iqbal law review symposium that promised “diverse interpretations. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 16 May 2023, there was a pre-trial review hearing in the case of Leeds and another v Burgess and others. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
 I also report on a visit to Essex Property Network and review David Lawrensons book. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  We can’t tell from Block whether there was more to some of those motions than meets the eye, but letting an expert testify in direct contradiction to his own prior peer-reviewed scholarship, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
[viii]  Second, the Fifth Circuit reviewed D.R. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A-Z on E-Discovery: What Does the Future Hold? [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am by admin
In a brief news release issued by Progress on Saturday, it said: “The Board of Directors, management and employees of Progress are disappointed in the announcement. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
  So far as the IPKat is concerned, whenever he sees letters like z, v, c and b all hanging around in each other's company, the only game he can think of is the very considerably-protected Scrabble. [read post]