Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 41 - 60
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
Consequently, it is incumbent upon the moving party to make a prima facie showing that he is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law (CPLR 3212 [b];Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980];Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 [1979]);Zarr v Riccio, 180 AD2d 734, 735 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:42 am
In the Renfroe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:29 pm
A: Apparently, when Dickie Scruggs is involved.Take a look at this new lawsuit filed by Scruggs against one of the law firms that had been defending the Rigsby sisters, Kerri and Cori, in the Renfroe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:29 pm
Take a look at this new lawsuit filed by Scruggs against one of the law firms that had been defending the Rigsby sisters, Kerri and Cori, in the Renfroe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:07 pm
Matt StockJason ZuckermanIn the following guest post, Matt Stock and Jason Zuckerman take a look at five ways that the SEC whistleblower program has affected both corporate compliance and the SEC’s enforcement efforts. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:00 am
In Carpenter & Zuckerman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:41 pm
In Bonds v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:51 am
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 3:42 pm
Of particular interest is The Court's holding regarding intoxication of the injured worker; "The evidence that the plaintiff was not engaged in a statutorily protected activity or was intoxicated was not admissible (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 563, 404 N.E.2d 718, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595; Maniscalco v Liro Eng'g Constr. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 2:40 am
However, counsel "must submit supporting facts in evidentiary form sufficient to justify the default" (Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead v Jablonsky, 283 AD2d 553, 554 [2001]) and include "a detailed explanation of [the] oversights" (Hospital for Joint Diseases v ELRAC, Inc., 11 AD3d 432, 433 [2004]; see also Grezinsky v Mount Hebron Cemetery, 305 AD2d 542 [2003]; Morris v Metropolitan Transp. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Marcus Argument Recap: Five Takeaways from Lawson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:05 pm
(See Zuckerman v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 3:35 am
Likewise, contrary to defendants’ contention on cross appeal, the court properly denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint inasmuch as defendants failed to meet their initial burden (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm
Symposium Dinner"Why Batson Usually Does Not Work" - Stephen BrightFriday, October 21, 2011 - SymposiumThere will be three panels discussing Batson v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:17 pm
In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
Bloch Zuckerman Spaeder Carl S. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 am
Or Ethan Zuckerman’s inspiring and challenging piece on International News. [read post]
