Search for: "Zuckerman v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co., 91 NY2d at 653; Soto v State Farm Ins. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Four key takeaways from the Supreme Court's decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co. of Midwest v Casella, 278 AD2d 417, 418, lv denied 96 NY2d 710; Walburn v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:09 am
Zuckerman, 388 Mass. 8, 12-15 (1983); Informix, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
Zuckerman v. [read post]
What the Archimedes' Principle and Empty In-Ground Swimming Pools Have to Do With Insurance Coverage
12 May 2010, 11:12 am
This blawg's discussion of the Javier v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:44 am
Zuckerman does not say what it says. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
The opponent of a summary judgment motion must present admissible evidence that is sufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:11 am
Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
No breach of restrictive covenant in Nlogic Inc. v Microtherapy Inc., 2017 ONSC 722 https://t.co/3H9kXUraHm -> CASL Workshop: Preparing Yourself for the Private Right of Action Coming in July https://t.co/R9bIrgUq6n -> Google, Waze Reach Deal In GPS App Maker's Copyright Suit https://t.co/hbFcf402v7 -> Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions but not rest of issues https://t.co/mfye8Tlx47 -> Chinese pirates are facing lifelong… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
Yesudian v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
, 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:33 am
Khouzam v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
Nor do they qualify as an admission absent evidence that the employees were authorized to speak on CSI's behalf (see Gstalder v State of New York, 240 AD2d 541, 542 [1997]; Vozdik v Frederick, 146 AD2d 898, 900 [1989]). [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
One witness, V, stated decedent "was incoherent of everything and did not know what was going on around him." [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Accordingly, we conclude that State Farm established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to Langan's claim for uninsured motorist benefits by establishing that Spicehandler's injury and subsequent death were caused by Popadich's intentional criminal acts (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
If the moving party meets his burden, the party opposing the motion must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of a material issue of fact that would require a trial as held in the analogous case of Zuckerman v City of New York. [read post]
