Search for: "Zuckerman v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
No breach of restrictive covenant in Nlogic Inc. v Microtherapy Inc., 2017 ONSC 722 https://t.co/3H9kXUraHm -> CASL Workshop: Preparing Yourself for the Private Right of Action Coming in July https://t.co/R9bIrgUq6n -> Google, Waze Reach Deal In GPS App Maker's Copyright Suit https://t.co/hbFcf402v7 -> Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions but not rest of issues https://t.co/mfye8Tlx47 -> Chinese pirates are facing lifelong… [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Cir. 2015) Zuckerman c. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm
Following its 1985 opinion in Zuckerman v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Thus, they are distinguishing the landmark 1985 decision in Zuckerman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
Consequently, it is incumbent upon the moving party to make a prima facie showing that he is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law (CPLR 3212 [b];Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980];Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 [1979]);Zarr v Riccio, 180 AD2d 734, 735 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
Blogger Ethan Zuckerman published the following arresting figures on his site on January 9. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
Zuckerman Family Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Zuckerman, the court said: 'Under section 543 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, implementing section 8 of article VI of the State Constitution, 'the Appellate Division has complete jurisdiction to reduce the sentence'. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:44 am
Zuckerman does not say what it says. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm
Related Cases: Rubin v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am
” In reliance on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Zuckerman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:23 pm
Zuckerman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm
Or. and Zuckerman v City of New York ruled that the proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
If the moving party meets his burden, the party opposing the motion must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of a material issue of fact that would require a trial as held in the analogous case of Zuckerman v City of New York. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
One witness, V, stated decedent "was incoherent of everything and did not know what was going on around him." [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
Once this showing has been made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action based on the ruling in the case of Zuckerman v City of New York. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 3:30 am
In Zuckerman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:49 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
In Wortman v. [read post]
