Search for: "class Plaintiffs"
Results 41 - 60
of 34,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2007, 10:34 am
In her recent order, she denies Plaintiffs’ motion to certify the class. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
The post Collectability May Be An Issue For GPB Class Action Plaintiffs – Broker-Dealers Still Liable appeared first on Securities Arbitration Lawyers Blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
.: Delaware Certifies Class Even Though Lead Plaintiff Sold Shares John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson notes: Here is Vice Chancellor Parsons' opinion in In re Celera Corp., in which he certified a class for settlement purposes and approved the settlement even though the lead plaintiff had sold its shares in the Celera before its merger with a subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics was completed. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:26 am
When a class-action lawsuit settles, courts generally distribute the money paid by a defendant to the class, or group of plaintiffs on whose behalf the suit was brought. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:51 am
I don’t think I’ve seen any case in which a named plaintiff has sought to discharge class counsel. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
In a June 6, 2011 decision, the United States Supreme Court just reversed the Fifth Circuit in the Halliburton securities litigation holding that securities fraud plaintiffs are not required to prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 10:07 pm
This sentiment was echoed by plaintiff’s class action lawyer Kenneth Wexler of Wexler Wallace, who suggested that all plaintiffs’ class certification motions should be accompanied by an actual trial plan. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
The court held that “an unaccepted . . . offer of judgment that fully satisfies a named plaintiff’s individual claim before the named plaintiff files a motion for class certification . . . does not moot the case.” [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:42 pm
Representing a nationwide class of “all persons who purchased Hydroxycut-branded products,” the plaintiffs alleged violations of various state consumer protection laws, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. [read post]
28 May 2021, 11:49 am
Does a proposed representative plaintiff in a class action in Alberta have the right to change their counsel mid-course, and if so, when should the Court interfere with this decision? [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 10:08 am
., where the Court of Appeal denied leave to appeal[1], the Quebec Superior Court approved the settlement agreement between the parties, with the exception of the portion of the settlement relating to the individual claim of the plaintiff-class representative, which provided for the payment of an amount nearly 10 times greater than that to which the other class members were entitled. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:52 am
Class action plaintiffs are breathing a little easier with last week’s decision by the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
P. 23(b)(3), a plaintiff’s damages model must survive the same “rigorous analysis” accorded all other aspects of the class certification motion. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
To bring a class action claim, plaintiffs must certify the class by satisfying the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:38 am
Proposed plaintiffs in the Sunrise Propane class action have won a skirmish, forcing provincial regulators to immediately turn over photographs, videos, and parts of witness statements concerning the explosion site. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:54 pm
Those obligations modify the duty of loyalty proposed class counsel owes to the plaintiff. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
” The plaintiff further framed the class’s harm from violations as “irreparable harm as a result of the defendant’s unlawful and wrongful conduct,” and that “Plaintiff and members of the class continue to be exposed to an elevated risk of identity theft. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
” The plaintiff further framed the class’s harm from violations as “irreparable harm as a result of the defendant’s unlawful and wrongful conduct,” and that “Plaintiff and members of the class continue to be exposed to an elevated risk of identity theft. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
” The plaintiff further framed the class’s harm from violations as “irreparable harm as a result of the defendant’s unlawful and wrongful conduct,” and that “Plaintiff and members of the class continue to be exposed to an elevated risk of identity theft. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:35 pm
The initial verdict for the plaintiff class was approximately $37 million. [read post]
