Search for: "f/n/u Deal" Results 41 - 60 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Words matter and when it comes to tax, words matter a great deal. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Für die näher Interessierten hier noch ein Verweis auf die Infoseite mit Material zur Bilski-Entscheidung und Podcasts (zu Bilski und ähnlichen Themen) der am Rechtsstreit beteiligten US-Kanzlei Finnegan. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:16 am by Mayela Celis
PLURALIDAD DE SUPUESTOS NORMATIVOS / Ligia Claudia González Lozano y Nuria González Martín CONCEPTO, CUESTIONAMIENTOS Y ORÍGEN IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA CUESTIÓN PRINCIPAL U ORIGINAL Y DE LA ADYACENTE III. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
We've seen several decisions that bring back memories of stuff we've had to deal with over the years, and sometimes decades.Taking the most recent decision first, the Second Circuit finally put an end to the long-running circus that's been firearms litigation in New York state. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas where the two… [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 2:25 pm by Stephen Page
The court is reluctant to make value judgments as to the merits of differing cultural, religious or ethnic heritage: see Sanders and Sanders [1976] FLC 90-078 at 75,374; N and N [1981] FLC 91-111 at 76,828-9. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:04 am
The Board is presently dealing with an appeal backlog of about 20,000 cases.[2].For some creative, but losing, arguments against obviousness-type double patenting tried by applicants who couldn't or wouldn't file a terminal disclaimer, see Karen's earlier blog post on the subject.[3].The policy might be challenged as arbitrary or capricious, since overcoming provisional rejections can hardly be said to be "necessary" for consideration of any outstanding… [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But of course any corporation that deals with customers all over the country through bricks-and-mortar stores would have to comply with the laws of those places where it operates. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm by mjpetro
Hatchett, 245 F.3d 625, 643 (7th Cir. 2001), that the convictions were admissible to show that Hicks was a "knowing participant" instead of an "unwitting bystander" to the drug deal. [read post]